And The Beat Goes On
I’m replicating my response to this comment on TechMedica just for shits and giggles.
1) Google Maps is not always right!
They have a Google Map link to their place just below that photo. If it’s good enough for them it’s good enough for me to call bullshit on it.
2) Techmedica has two locations. The building you refer to is supposed to be their office. I called them on this and I asked the same question. They do have another location where everything is put together (the capsules).
I referred to two locations, one in Grand Rapids, one in Nevada. They have a picture of a building in Grand Rapids with a Las Vegas address below it. Does that make any sense? No. It’s a less than honest representation of their company.
That, and I’ll bet you dollars to donuts that the building they picture on their website has been Photoshopped. The lettering on the signs with the company logo is too clean, too white, and is entirely off center.
That and when you zoom in you see that the letters are prefectly shaded — just as they would be if placed there via Photoshop.
I’ll swing by tomorrow and take a picture of the actual building. I could be wrong, but I’d bet 100:1 odds that I’m right.
I am not sure why so many people are bent on talking bad about a company.
Because we believe it’s a scam run by a con artist that’s defrauding people left and right? Thats my motivation. Hell, I threw away the possibility of makin some spare cash by firing off an email to every email address I could find within the company railing against Tony Pham.
Why would somebody throw away a money making opportunity? Ethics? Yeah, that sounds about right.
If things were this bad the gov would have shut them down for good.
Give it time. Eventually the market or the government will shut this one down.
Many people point to the fda doc / request which in the end Techmedica fixed the labels to where their would not be any problems. How do I know this you might be asking, because I called and asked the same thing.
I usually don’t have to place multiple calls to a supplier of a health product to verify that they’re legitimate. That should throw up a nice big red flag.
I also read the fda doc thoroughly as well and I understood it as a bad label or bad marking on the product and, they needed to change the way the customer reviews - to show no “cures” and to make sure the heading didn’t say “here is the proof” etc.
In other word they were illegally labeling their product. All that research on a super-duper advanced cure-all drug and they never had anybody on staff that knew about FDA regulations with regards to product labeling?
Yeah that sounds like an honest mistake.
Update: Comments are closed. I’m sick of people astroturfing here.